On 12/22/06, Raymond Toy <raymond.toy at ericsson.com> wrote:
> sen1 at math.msu.edu wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I think it would be nice to translate and include
> > ARPACK to lisp and maxima.
> >
> I've looked at this very briefly. It seems possible to convert this to
> lisp via f2cl, except for the non-standard "include" statements.
>
> ARPACK, however, requires LAPACK and BLAS to work.
>
> Is there real interest in ARPACK with maxima?
For my part, I believe ARPACK is too specialized to be included at present.
I think at this point we should focus on LAPACK instead
because it is more general-purpose.
For what it's worth,
Robert