Why I think lapack matrices should not be converted to list-of-lists.
Subject: Why I think lapack matrices should not be converted to list-of-lists.
From: Raymond Toy
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:36:13 -0500
>>>>> "sen1" == sen1 <sen1 at math.msu.edu> writes:
sen1> If it is not too silly, I think it would be good to have both floats
sen1> and bigfloats supported, perhaps in separate packages. It might take
sen1> a lot longer to run, but, in some cases, the user might be willing to wait.
sen1> There are a number of applications of moderate size, say matrices of
sen1> order up to 500x500 where knowing the bigfloat answers might be
sen1> useful.
LAPACK only supports 2 precisions: single and double. I am only
doing the double precision version since maxima normally operates in
double-precision.
Ray