5.11.0 won't compile with fasl format 72

Hi,
  I don't know if this is important, but I could not compile
  maxima-5.11.0 with the sbcl which is made for Fedora Core 6.

sbcl-1.0.1-4.fc6

There are no problems with gcl, cmucl, or clisp.


Here are the error messages

debugger invoked on a SIMPLE-ERROR:
   Error during processing of --eval option "(progn (load
   \"../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp\") (funcall (intern (symbol-name
   :operate-on-system) :mk) \"maxima\" :compile :verbose t)
   (sb-ext:quit))":

   #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM for "file
    /usr/local/src/maxima/src/binary-sbcl/nregex.fasl" {AB3E2F9}>
   is in native code fasl file format version 66, but this version of
    SBCL uses
   format version 72.

Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:QUIT) to exit from SBCL.

restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
   0: [CONTINUE] Ignore and continue with next --eval option.
   1: [ABORT   ] Skip rest of --eval options.
   2:            Skip to toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.
   3: [QUIT    ] Quit SBCL (calling #'QUIT, killing the process).

((LAMBDA (SB-IMPL::E)) #<SB-FASL::INVALID-FASL-VERSION {AB3F969}>)

Just as an aside. I used to run Fedora Core 4--no problems compiling
maxima with clisp, sbcl, cmucl, or gcl. The old version of sbcl was

sbcl-0.9.14-1.fc4.1.


   The MB on my old computer died and I bought one of these fancy new Intel Core
   2 duo boxes.  To get Fedora installed without a lot of hassles, it
   took upgrading to FC-6.  Then, when trying to compile maxima, I ran
   into the above problems.

-sen


-- 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Sheldon E. Newhouse            |    e-mail: sen1 at math.msu.edu           |
  | Mathematics Department         |       				   |
  | Michigan State University      | telephone: 517-355-9684                |
  | E. Lansing, MI 48824-1027 USA  |       FAX: 517-432-1562                |
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------