stuck with vectors



-----maxima-bounces at math.utexas.edu wrote: -----


>But here's a follow up question:  when I
>substituted #s for x, expand
>(''mm); gave a one by one matrix, which seems a
>little weird:

What do you mean by 'substituted #s for x'? What
command did you use? I understood this, maybe I'd
be able to figure out your remaining questions.

Barton