Subject: gcd problem / really bignums for exponents
From: Robert Dodier
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 08:28:13 -0700
On 2/14/07, Stavros Macrakis <macrakis at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > If (as someone has suggested) he was going to edit code so that f+ is
> > replaced by +, I oppose this. If he wants to make a compile-time flag to
> > optionally redefine the f+ macro to expand to generic +,
>
> This is the right way to do it -- except it shouldn't be f+ itself (which
> may be being used legitimately in some other case, e.g. array subscripting),
> but cref+ or something.
Agreed.
Robert