On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 19:02 -0600, Robert Dodier wrote:
> I went back through the mailing list archive and the most recent
> discussion I found was from Sept 2006. I proposed (and now I'll
> repeat the proposal) that a new operator, named "dot" or something
> else, be defined in vect.mac to represent the scalar product.
Why not to use innerproduct or its abbreviation inprod? It is already
implemented in share/matrix and documented in the manual. It is
currently not defined as commutative, but that could be changed.
Jaime