implication as infix operator



On 6/25/07, Wolfgang Lindner <LindnerW at t-online.de> wrote:

> Is there a problem with the special symbol 'at-sign'??

Yes, there is. Sorry for the confusion.

The @ is the operator for the defstruct code which made its way
into Maxima in the most recent release. So the examples which
define "@" as an operator should have been changed to something
else (e.g. "##" or something).

Maxima allows either the infix declaration to be first or the
function definition. I said otherwise before; that was incorrect.

Hope this helps.

Robert Dodier