On 7/20/07, Kostas Oikonomou <ko at research.att.com> wrote:
> I guess we all agree on
>
> (a) name standardization (of a sort to be agreed upon!) is a
> good thing
> (b) name consistency is a good thing
> (c) short names are good for often-used commands/functions
> (d) long names are good otherwise
> (e) name/command completion is a good thing
> (f) a nicely-organized manual is a good thing
Yes, these are all good things.
Just to circle back to the proposal on the table:
how about changing "ilt" to "laplace_inverse".
I'm not proposing any other name changes at the moment.
best
Robert