Hi Robert,
That's great what you suggested. Thanks a lot. Though used Maxima about two
or three years ago, I am still a freshman. rfs.max is the first and almost
the only code I wrote in maxima. Without any experience, I just tried
myself. So, many things in the code look ugly. Thank you very much for
revising it for me. I'm looking forward to see it.
Best wishes,
YC
On Nov 29, 2007 6:00 PM, Robert Dodier <robert.dodier at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/07, Zou Yuan-Chuan <yuanchuan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I got two problems and showed them: tex output and radcan. In fact,
> these
> > are new problems which doesn't occur in version 5.9.2. I wrote a code
> works
> > well on 5.9.2 about two years ago. Unfortunately, when I tried to run it
> on
> > 5.13.0 these days, the above two problems occur. Attached is the source
> file
> > and one output file (transfered into pdf. on 5.9.2).
>
> Hi Yuan-Chuan, thanks for sending rfs.max. It is always very encouraging
> to see that people use Maxima for real work! I think the program can be
> revised to use more natural notation, e.g. epsilon[0] instead of
> \\epsilon_\{0\} for variables, which makes it easier to read as a Maxima
> program and also produces the expected TeX output. Working with
> rfs.max has helped me find & fix a couple of minor bugs in Maxima;
> those changes will appear in the next release.
>
> best
>
> Robert Dodier
>