On 3/17/08, Raymond Toy (RT/EUS) <raymond.toy at ericsson.com> wrote:
> An example from bug 1901044 (from Barton):
>
> (%i1) integrate((5*x-2)^199,x);
> (%o1) (5*x-2)^200/1000
>
> (%i2) integrate((5*x-2)^3,x);
> (%o2) (125*x^4)/4-50*x^3+30*x^2-8*x
> Any opinions on whether this is the right thing to do? And if so, why
> 6, and not some other value? Or should we just use the general
> formula always?
OK by me to use the general formula for all cases.
Thanks for looking into this.
Robert