On 3/24/08, Stavros Macrakis <macrakis at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> If the DONLP license allows commercial *distribution* freely, what's
> the problem? We simply need to make sure to preserve the license on
> the source file. If we want to be ultra-conservative, I suppose we
> could have it print a load-time warning "Warning: The DONLP package is
> not licensed for commercial use". We don't need to put it in a
> separate directory, though I suppose another possibility is to put it
> in share/noncommercialuseonly and not put that on the loadpath by
> default.
I'm completely opposed to this. We have enough headaches as it is.
Ray or anyone else is free to distribute DONLP in whatever
manner they like.
best
Robert