Ray wrote:
>What lisp did you use? Declaring memq inline for cmucl and sbcl (and
>maybe others?) would have been just as effective and way less
>work.
I use sbcl, clisp, gcl and openmcl (and soon I will also have
access to cmucl).
Well, an inline declaration might or might not do what we want;
the standard says that an implementations is not obliged to inline
anything.
And besides, it wasn't much work and I am still convinced that
there are also other reasons to remove memq and use member (see
what Robert Dodier wrote in another mail).
I really don't get it why some people are so attached to memq.
Andreas