On 4/12/08, Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I'm not sure how to make everyone (else) happy, but I would like memq
> defined as a macro, and its use encouraged.
OK. I think I've had enough of MEMQ for a lifetime or two.
Andreas, in the interest of simply reducing strife,
please don't change any more MEMQ's.
If someone wants to revert some MEMBER to MEMQ,
that's OK by me.
FWIW
Robert Dodier