On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Andrej Vodopivec
<andrej.vodopivec at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is not a bug. ... The hash table functions are
> not documented. You shouldn't assume anything about functions which
> are not documented. If you find a function in graphs package which
> gives results different than what the documentation claims, then that
> is a bug. I have no interest in providing a general hash table in the
> graphs package.
Perfectly reasonable! I wasn't even aware of these functions until
Kullman brought them up....
May I suggest, though, that you rename internal functions to something
more obscure to avoid user confusion? e.g. internal_hash_table
-s