On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Robert Dodier <robert.dodier at gmail.com> wrote:
> join ([1, 2, 3], [a, b, c]);
> => [1, a, 2, b, 3, c]
>
> Although the name is suboptimal ... "interlace" or "intersperse" would
> be better, "join" suggests to me something else.
Agreed. Interlace seems like a better name, and it should take an
arbitrary number of arguments.
-s