Richard Fateman wrote:
>
> I think that consistency with Macsyma means consistency with a design that
> has perhaps has had more professional thought than we may be willing to
> commit to at the moment. It is not just a matter of portability of programs.
> Though that too is a plus.
I also think compatibility with Macsyma is important. We should try to
be compatible with Macsyma, unless there is a good reason to deviate.
Ray