"fastfib" in the gf package faster than "fib"



Raymond Toy (RT/EUS) wrote:
> Perhaps the differences can be accounted for by the fact that two
> different versions of maxima are being run?  On my machine, gcl (2.6.8)
> says:
> 
>   Evaluation took 46.7300 seconds (75.8100 elapsed)
> 
> Cmucl (Snapshot 2008-07) says
>   Evaluation took 57.7300 seconds (69.2500 elapsed) using 35.077 MB.
> 
> Perhaps the difference is also in the platform.  (I ran this on a sparc).

Indeed one is maxima 5.14.0 and the other is maxima 5.15.0, but i doubt this
explains such a difference. The machine is a Pentium 4, 3 Ghz running
FreeBSD.

> 
> BTW, is factor supposed to produce (x^230+x+1)*(x^231-x+3)?  It doesn't
> for me.  I get (x^2+x+1)*(x^228 <more stuff)*(x^231-x+3).  Perhaps
> that's ok since it seems x^230+x+1 has x^2+x+1 as a factor.
> 

Indeed.

> Ray




-- 
Michel Talon