I have commited the changes to rtest_hypgeo.mac and rtesthyp.mac. All reported
testsuite failures vanish and the tests pass for GCL 2.6.8 and Windows XP.
Since a longer time I have two failures in rtest16.mac. I have never reported
these problems. Because nobody else reported a problem it seems to be specific
for my system. The failures don't occur with Maxima 5.15.0 and GCL 2.6.8.
Failed tests in rtest16.mac (GCL 2.6.8 and Windows XP):
********************** Problem 103 ***************
Input:
tex(t[1],false)
Result:
\$t_\{1\}\$\$\
This differed from the expected result:
\$t_\{1\}\$\$\
\
********************** Problem 104 ***************
Input:
(foo:x[1]^2,tex(foo,false))
Result:
\$x_\{1\}\^2\$\$\
This differed from the expected result:
\$x_\{1\}\^2\$\$\
\
119/121 tests passed.
The following 2 problems failed: (103 104)
Dieter Kaiser
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: robert.dodier at gmail.com [mailto:robert.dodier at gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. Juli 2008 03:12
An: Dieter Kaiser
Cc: maxima at math.utexas.edu
Betreff: Re: [Maxima] test suite failures with cvs Maxima
On 7/27/08, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:
> We have to renumber about 200 examples. It is really much more
> simple to add a test.
It's OK in this case to insert another test, but in general I think it
makes unnecessary difficulties to number the tests in the comments.
Typically tests are added or taken away more or less at random.
I don't see a good reason to make that unworkable.
> With the changes above we have no longer problems with the testsuite
> (GCL 2.6.8 and Windows XP). Should I commit the changes?
OK by me.
best
Robert Dodier