Wrong simplification of log(1/z)

• Subject: Wrong simplification of log(1/z)
• From: Robert Dodier
• Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:24:47 -0600

On 7/29/08, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:

>  So we have a Log function with no check of the parameters. This might be correct
>  for a wide range of parameters including z,a real and positive. For a complete
>  symbolically support of the Log function the most general correct answer could
>  be:

For my part, I hope you will review & revise the code so it yields the
simplest (as you see it) correct result in each case (real negative vs real
positive vs complex non-real, or whatever).

best

Robert Dodier

• Prev by Date: Wrong simplification of log(1/z)
• Next by Date: Hypergeometric function notation
• Previous by thread: Wrong simplification of log(1/z)
• Next by thread: Wrong simplification of log(1/z)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread