More work on the Exponential Integrals



On 7/30/08, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:

>  3. More support for the Gammaincomplete function

I don't see any problems with the technical stuff you have proposed.
But can we name this function gamma_incomplete instead of
gammaincomplete? It is easier to read with the underbar.

Thanks a lot for all your work on this topic.

best

Robert Dodier