David Ronis wrote:
> Here's what I get:
>
> (%i1) :lisp (expt 2d0 (/ #c(10d0 0d0) 2));
> #C(32.0 0.0)
> (%i1) :lisp (gamma-lanczos (+ 1 (/ #c(10d0 0d0) 2)));
> #C(119.99999999999996 0.0)
> (%i1) :lisp (expt (/ 2 (float pi)) (/ (- 1 (cos (* (float pi) #c(10d0
> 0d0)))) 4));
> #C(1.0 0.0)
>
> Looks the same as yours.
Interesting. Then what does double_factorial(10.0) return?
> BTW, the testsuite now doesn't complain.
You mean after you updated from CVS again? That's because Dieter
changed the threshold. I wonder if there's not something else going on,
and the original threshold was correct.
Ray