-----maxima-bounces at math.utexas.edu wrote: -----
conjugate (ii);
>(%o4) - ii
>(%i5) conjugate (xx + yy);
>(%o5) yy + xx
>
>Was:
>(%i5) conjugate (xx + yy);
>
>(%o5) conjugate(yy) + conjugate(xx)
>
>(I guess the new result is correct since xx and yy are assumed real.)
Yes, new value yy + xx is better than the old conjugate(yy) + conjugate
(xx). If you
would change the user documentation, that would be good.
>8. The linear algebra stuff contains a lot of messages from "rat" in
>the output. Should we set ratprint : fase for update_examples?
I think this would be OK--maybe prepend something like "To prevent messages
from "rat", we'll
globally set ratprint to false for the linear algebra example."
Thanks for working on this.
Barton