question / comments about sublis



On 2/2/09, Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> A reason to call the program sublis  is that it corresponds to an already
> existing common lisp function.
>  Less intellectual overhead for people who know lisp already,

I'm pretty sure it's in the best interests of the project to focus on
the other 99% of users.

Robert Dodier