ratsimp and the order of terms



Am Freitag, den 20.03.2009, 15:36 -0500 schrieb Barton Willis:
> -----maxima-bounces at math.utexas.edu wrote: -----

> >From Common Lisp, code should call sratsimp, not $ratsimp:
> 
>  (%i29) :lisp ($ratsimp $x);
>  ((MPLUS RATSIMP) $S $L $K $J $H $G $F $D $A)
> 
>  (%i29) :lisp (sratsimp $x);
>  ((MPLUS SIMP) $A $D $F $G $H $J $K $L $S)
> 
> I think it's correct that the testsuite catches these bugs.
> 

Thank you for the hint. I will have a look at the code of $laplace and
try to improve it.

Dieter Kaiser