On 2 May 2009, Robert Dodier wrote:
-------------------------------------
I'm going to make the fft functions
handle lists as well as arrays, and also handle a single argument
from which real and imaginary parts are extracted. I'm guessing
these changes will make it easier to use.
I am also considering changing the name of the inverse function
from ift to ifft, since it is the inverse of fft, not ft.
What do you think of this name change? Another possibility is
fft_inverse.
---------------------------------------------------
The added flexibility of use you mention will be welcomed by
serious users. Also, I like fft_inverse, even though it takes longer
to type.
Ted Woollett