Maxima by Example: Ch. 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11



Sheldon Newhouse wrote:

> At least from my point of view (and that of many others), interest in 
> non-linear dynamics grows and grows and grows.
> After all, most of the problems in non-linear dynamics are far from 
> solved, and new ideas and relationships with other branches of science 
> are appearing all the time. If anyone said that broad interest in 
> nonlinear dynamics peaked around 1995, then, IMO, that person was making 
> a rather narrow definition of the term "broad interest" or a narrow 
> definition of "nonlinear dynamics" or both.

If your definition of broad interest is "everyone wants a strange 
attractor on their T-shirt" then I think 1995 is close to the right 
peak. If you mean the number of people actually doing some kind of 
nonlinear dynamics in real applications... then that is certainly still 
growing, but it's become more of a tool than a topic in itself, and 
certainly isn't in the popular mind the way it was when Gleick's "Chaos" 
  and Bass' "The Eudaemonic Pie" was published..