> Richard Fateman wrote:
> > Could you share your timing results with us?
> >
> >> And sbcl runs twice slower than cmucl on the same programs.
>
> Last week i have run maxima computations which took around 10 hours
> each. For the sake of comparison i have run the same job under sbcl on
> another machine, exactly similar. It was running more than twice slower
> until it bombed out.
I'm also surprised with it. On the my problems, related with itensor as well
as in 2D eigen value computations by Galerkin methods, sbcl is factor 1.5-2
faster than cmucl, factor 10 in compare to gcl and factor 100 in compare to
clisp.
fiw
Valery