The new semantics for simplimit



On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbrick at gmail.com> wrote:

> Basically, it looks something like
>
> approx_for_eps: 'integrate( something_nasty, s, A-eps, A );
>
> and then you get a Taylor series for the approximation by
> differentiating the above and taking the limit as eps -> 0+. Problem is,
> the limits now all include noun forms :)
>
> Is there a way to tell Maxima that "Yes, I know what I'm doing. This
> integral is continuous." ?

I can't tell what's going on here. What, specifically, have you tried?

best

Robert Dodier