On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 07:07 -0500, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> I think I'd prefer to *unify*
> the concepts: they are just different concrete manifestations of maps
> x -> y, where lists have x in 1..n. Maps in general should be
> first-class values, not a special properties of symbols (as hasharrays
> are). They would print uniformly. There would be a standard input
> syntax for maps. Etc.
I like that idea. Lists would be ordered maps.
Jaime