Problems in integrate



Hi, Ray
   Thanks for your kind reply. The expression might be positive since there
are some physical constraints. I'll check that later.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/14/10 11:34 AM, Lin Xie wrote:
> > Hi, Leo
> >    Thanks for the reply! Well, the integral is a problem in modelling
> > microdomain structures in crystal and to my knowledge I do not know
> > that the problem can be easily overcomed in such way.
>
> Why not?  Aren't you trying to integrate over R^n?
>
> The matrix A can be easily determined from your expression.  If E is the
> the quadratic, then the matrix A that Leo refers to is
>
> genmatrix(lambda([i,j], if i = j 1 else
> coeff(coeff(E,concat(x,j)),concat(x,i))),8,8)
>
> I have forgotten exactly what the result of the integration would be,
> but the determinant of A in this case is not too complicated:
>
> factor(ratsimp(determinant(A))) ->
>
> (t-r+1)^2*(t+r+1)^2*(t-2*s+r+1)*(t+2*s-r+1)*(3*t-2*s-r-1)*(3*t+2*s+r-1)
>
> (It's not clear to me if this expression positive or not.)
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>



-- 
Lin Xie
Beijing National Center for Electron Microscopy
Department of Material Science and Engineering
Tsinghua University
Beijing, PR of China