Subject: solve remembers too much, asks odd questions.
From: Michel Talon
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:29:53 +0100
Richard Fateman wrote:
>
> A solution is discussed here ..
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/papers/y=z2w.pdf
I have read the paper and i do not agree with what you are saying.
sqrt(z) has 2 values for any complex values of z, except 0 and
infinity. This shows the inanity of the conventional cut on the negative
real axis which indeed leads to the difficulties you mention. In fact
the cut between 0 and infinity is completely arbitrary and can be
any curve in the complex plane joining these two points, which are
themselves intrinsic as branch points of a branched covering.
The real problem is not this one, it is "how many values take
sqrt(2) + sqrt(5)" for example, or worse "sqrt(2)+5^{1/3}". Or for another
example, how many values take the Cardan solutions of the degree 3
equations. You know in this case there are 3 solutions, which is not
immediately obvious from the Cardan formulas.
The answer to such questions lies in the theory of Riemann surfaces, and
requires non trivial analysis of the considered algebraic equation. One may
represent the Riemann surface as a branched covering of some degree, with
some arbitrary well chosen cuts between the branch points. Then one may
define a determination of the algebraic function on the cut complex plane.
> or just letting the program run and see what comes out.
Still this is the main benefit one can get from a CAS program in case it
finds a non obvious simplification. There is nothing as irritating as a CAS
which is unable to simplify an expression with a bunch of square roots
without getting "expression too large errors" (i got that under Maple) and
wasting hours of your time for computations that you finally do by hand in a
couple of minutes. All these sign considerations and "assumptions" get in
the way of the computation, for zero benefit in general. Expecting a CAS to
give correct results for non trivial computations (integrals, etc.) is not
reasonable, one certainly needs to check the result by all sorts of means,
but a CAS may be of great help by finding an unexpected "simple" form.
And of course one expects a CAS to give correct results for "trivial"
computations, that is purely polynomial computations, however large they may
be.
--
Michel Talon