On 12/30/10, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oops. I think I made that change, after some discussions here on what
> would be valid extensions. I didn't find any such files, and no one
> mentioned they were using such extensions. I think we should just add
> max as a valid extension.
OK by me.
> (Maybe we can make it configurable?)
Doesn't seem worth the trouble.
best
Robert Dodier