On 1/11/11, Raymond Toy <toy.raymond at gmail.com> wrote:
> I, however, partly disagree with you and Robert. I think part of the
> comment you gave *IS* relevant. I don't care too much about the name,
> but surely the comment about supporting more than one non-T condition is
> good. The reference to dim-mcond is good too. (Things in maxima are
> spread all over and are often times not where I expect them to be. Grep
> is my friend.)
Well, the stuff about MCOND expressions is fine;
any technical stuff is fine, which I said before.
I was reacting to the dates & authors business.
I guess I didn't make that clear.
best
Robert Dodier