On 1/17/11 10:49 AM, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:
>> sbcl-1.0.45 165 (*)
This is a known failure that is supposed to be fixed in sbcl someday.
It has to do with the accuracy of cl:expt.
>
> So, ecl became faster, and errors in rtest16 (insufficient precision
> in some floating-point operations) disappeared. Failures in rtest8
> remained.
Yes, this was fixed in ecl some time ago (from reading the mailing list).
But I also get a failure in rtest14, prob 144. The bessel and airy
functions are not evaluated for some reason. This bug and the others
you mentioned have been there for quite some time. I've been too lazy
to investigate.
Ray