ilt vs inverse_laplace, was: Enhanced Laplace transforms and desolve for Maxima
Subject: ilt vs inverse_laplace, was: Enhanced Laplace transforms and desolve for Maxima
From: Kostas Oikonomou
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:30:44 -0500
Glad to hear it!
In the same vein, is there a reason that Laplace transforms
are under Ch. 19, "Differentiation", in the manual?
Wouldn't they be better situated in a separate chapter,
perhaps "Transforms", "Integral Transforms", or some such?
Kostas
On 01/26/11 11:15 AM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 1/25/11, Kostas Oikonomou<ko at research.att.com> wrote:
>
>> I think your Laplace transform work is great. So at this
>> point I'd like to revive an old discussion about the names,
>> "laplace" and "ilt". They are grossly mismatched. Why not
>> laplace and inverse_laplace?
>
> I'm in favor changing ilt to inverse_laplace.
>
> best
>
> Robert Dodier