Perhaps the manual could indicate the difference between the two?
The manual seems to indicate that
abc,flag1,flag2,flag3;
is equivalent to
ev(abc,flag1,flag2,flag3);
At 08:52 PM 3/29/2011, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
>ev(xxx,yyy) can mean many things. It can be (more or less) equivalent to block([yyy:true],xxx) or to yyy(xxx) or various other things.
>
>In the case of infeval, it is just an option setting to ev, and *not* equivalent to xxx,infeval:true or infeval(xxx).
>
>Ev is just a hodgepodge of functionality, some of which (alas!) is only accessible through it, e.g. infeval.
>
> -s
>
>On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 13:10, Henry Baker <hbaker1 at pipeline.com> wrote:
>Is there any reason why
>
>ev(...expression...,infeval)
>
>should be strictly more powerful than
>
>infeval:true;
>...expression...;
>
>For some reason, merely assigning infeval:true didn't produce the fully eval'ed expression, but ev(...expression...,infeval) did.