On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Oliver Kullmann wrote:
> HOWEVER, anyway, the only point for us trying Sbcl is that we are
> looking for an open-source Lisp (usable for Maxima) faster than Ecl.
> And I got the impression that Sbcl can't be faster then Ecl, or
> am I wrong?
Quoting myself:
On my box (Intel E5300 2.6Ghz), testsuite real times (in seconds) and
failed tests are
sbcl-1.0.50 204 rtest16 (386, 387)
gcl-2.6.8_pre 208
cmucl-20b_p001 211
clozurecl-1.7 293 rtest_gamma (673)
ecl-11.1.1 404 rtest8 (126, 127)
clisp-2.49 628
If the testsuite is representative, ecl is 2 times slower than sbcl.
Andrey