I think automake needs it. I think I tried sharefiles.mk.in but that
didn't work.
Ray
On Nov 13, 2011 11:03 AM, "Robert Dodier" <robert.dodier at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/11, Dieter Kaiser <drdieterkaiser at web.de> wrote:
>
> > In the last commits I have observed that the file sharefiles.mk has been
> > committed. I think this is not necessary, because this file will be
> > automatically generated and will be different for every developer.
>
> Yeah -- automatically-generated files cause trouble ...
> I think it's OK to have such files committed to Git
> (in case some system cannot regenerate them)
> but it seems like we can reduce the Git noise by committing
> foo.in (let's say) for any such file foo. I guess we would
> arrange for make to copy foo.in to foo, then attempt to
> regenerate it. I think this topic came up not too long ago,
> but I don't remember what was the resolution.
>
> best
>
> Robert Dodier
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima mailing list
> Maxima at math.utexas.edu
> http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
>