ECL



Paul Bowyer wrote:
> My ECL version of the same code, named "mysimpleprog" runs without
> difficulty.
>
> Notice again the difference in their sizes:
> s -l mysimpleprog
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 pfb pfb 35692 Nov 26 07:06 mysimpleprog*
>
> "32350236" for sbcl and "35692" for ecl

I don't argue about that, sbcl has tons of stuff inside, like system calls,
support for locales, etc. Probably there is a way to build a lean system but i
don't know how. Presently sbclcore is 26 Megs.

>
> Paul
>
> P.S.
> As I was writing my original message yesterday, my mother fell in
> another room of the house and broke her hip, so I may not be able answer
> back again very soon. Things are very hectic here at the present.

This is very serious, i hope the best for you two.


-- 
Michel Talon