new defint.lisp bug - was: new defint.lispandradexpand:false?
Subject: new defint.lisp bug - was: new defint.lispandradexpand:false?
From: Richard Hennessy
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:19:54 -0500
"I confess I've been pretty much ignoring this discussion but: Are you
claiming that you have a function that is not continuous but is an
antiderivative of exp(x^7)?
I presume that you have some understanding of how continuity is affected
by integration and differentation. Also, x |-> exp(x^7) is smooth."
My mistake.
No, I not claiming anything now, I took back that post. I was trying to
find a general anti-derivative. Aleksas has done it correctly, mine was
wrong. Sorry for the confusion. Just feel free to ignore my posts as you
were doing. Sorry about that.
Thank you Aleksas for posting the answer and it's proof.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Rupert Swarbrick
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 7:45 PM
To: maxima at math.utexas.edu
Subject: Re: [Maxima] new defint.lisp bug - was: new
defint.lispandradexpand:false?
_______________________________________________
Maxima mailing list
Maxima at math.utexas.edu
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima