On 1/26/12, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbrick at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1204711&group_id=4933&atid=104933
Well, I suspect it would require fewer changes to preserve
the existing chaining scheme, but if so, then we'll have to
work out a way to fix up the chain when one rule is removed.
I can't think of a way right now. Maybe you ought to go ahead
and work on this other approach.
best,
Robert Dodier