'at' simplification

• Subject: 'at' simplification
• From: nijso beishuizen
• Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 20:58:02 +0200

Dear all,

This:

at(diff(g(x),x),[y=1]) - at(diff(g(x),x),[y=0])

should result in 0. Is there a (built-in) way to achieve this? I would expect that 'at' (or some simplification function) would recognize that the expression is independent of y.
 		 	   		  

• Prev by Date: assigning a value to x in diff(f(x),x)
• Next by Date: is equal with realpart
• Previous by thread: asymptotic expansion of the error function
• Next by thread: 'at' simplification
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread