On 2012-05-17, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbrick at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a trivial patch, but I think that Richard has a good point in his
> reply to your message. Just because I've only managed to trigger one bit
> of code that makes this assumption about atoms doesn't mean all that
> much. What do you think is the right thing to do?
Well, I can't really tell what's at stake yet. Why don't you post your
patch so others can try it out. I'll give it a try.
best
Robert Dodier