Robert Dodier <robert.dodier at gmail.com> writes:
> On 2012-05-17, Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbrick at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a trivial patch, but I think that Richard has a good point in his
>> reply to your message. Just because I've only managed to trigger one bit
>> of code that makes this assumption about atoms doesn't mean all that
>> much. What do you think is the right thing to do?
>
> Well, I can't really tell what's at stake yet. Why don't you post your
> patch so others can try it out. I'll give it a try.
Something like the following seems to work.
Rupert
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: displa-clos-objects.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1524 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20120518/e45e4d6b/attachment.patch>;
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.math.utexas.edu/pipermail/maxima/attachments/20120518/e45e4d6b/attachment.pgp>;