maxima is 100 times slower than maple

• Subject: maxima is 100 times slower than maple
• From: Barton Willis
• Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:15:38 +0000

By the way: It seems that nothing depends on T[0,0], so the call to limit in

  limit(Z0[j+1]/((j+1)!), T[0,0],0)

seems unnecessary. Also, maybe you need to change one pi to %pi in the
definition of C[0].

--Barton
________________________________

• Prev by Date: maxima is 100 times slower than maple
• Next by Date: IEEE support and interval arithmetic
• Previous by thread: maxima is 100 times slower than maple
• Next by thread: maxima is 100 times slower than maple
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread