1, unless ratepsilon is very, very small.
We probably need a Gaussian form of the "rationalize"" function.
I'll fiddle around with this in Lisp.
At 03:53 PM 6/30/2012, Raymond Toy wrote:
>On 6/29/12 9:50 AM, Henry Baker wrote:
>> I want to "rationalize" a complex number, but I don't want to rationalize the real & imaginary parts separately, because this won't convert 1.0+%i*1.0e-10 into 1.
>
>What do you want 1.0+%i*1e-10 to rationalize to?
>
>Ray