Test regression in rtest_trig with cmucl

• Subject: Test regression in rtest_trig with cmucl
• From: Raymond Toy
• Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:16:20 -0700

On 7/19/12 5:50 PM, Barton Willis wrote:
> The intent of
>  
>     (setq l ($expand l))
>     (cons l l))
> 
> is to properly return (cons 0 0) or (cons 0.0 0.0), or ... Since 0 * 0.0
> --> 0,

I assumed that's what the expand was for.  Let me try with (cons 0 0)
and see what breaks.

Ray

• Prev by Date: Solving an equation with integral
• Next by Date: Test regression in rtest_trig with cmucl
• Previous by thread: Test regression in rtest_trig with cmucl
• Next by thread: Test regression in rtest_trig with cmucl
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread