Timing comparison for diffeq program in c++, Maple and Maxima
Subject: Timing comparison for diffeq program in c++, Maple and Maxima
From: John Lapeyre
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:04:17 +0200
> c++ is almost 32 times faster than Maple which is almost
> 31 times faster than Maxima So c++ is almost 982 times
> faster than Maxima.
Well, I can prove that maxima is three times faster than
Mathematica.
These were done on the same machine:
Mathematica 8.0:
In[9]:=
Timing[FactorInteger[8478652817085319534251064469689222730894091034507427331241538883820818894545883959]]
Out[9]= {2434.64, {{75582488424179347083438319, 1},
> {112177476474470525577861298937835338545723093134076373561, 1}}}
maxima 5.20.1 , gcl 2.6.7
(%i3)
factor(8478652817085319534251064469689222730894091034507427331241538883820818894545883959);
Evaluation took 783.2400 seconds (783.9600 elapsed)
(%o3) 75582488424179347083438319
112177476474470525577861298937835338545723093134076373561
John