approx-alike bug




> Hmm, I'd have thought that a regression test should check that taylorinfo of two taylor expressions was the same, not just the ratdisrep.  The list of vars of a CRE probably doesn't matter,
> because the ratdisrep will be different except in degenerate cases, and anyway doesn't have any mathematical importance (unlike the order of a taylor expansion, which does).

Oh, I agree.  To change this, about 100 tests need to changed. Likely it will be some time before I work on this. Fixing the
tests isn't  100% straightforward; for example the test

  taylor(1+x+y+z,[x,0,3],[y,1,2],[z,2,1]);
  4+(z-2)+(y-1)+x$

would need an   expected output of ''taylor(1+x+y+z,[x,0,3],[y,1,2],[z,2,1])"  And that's  silly. The next test is

  1/%;
  1/4-(z-2)/16+(-1/16+(z-2)/32)*(y-1)+(1/64-3*(z-2)/256)*(y-1)^2  + <more stuff>

Fixing these requires thought.

--Barton