On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Stavros Macrakis
<macrakis at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Nice generalization! The old code allowed constants like %e as the axis
> variable, so why not also allow 2.718 and 87/32? :-)
Why not indeed -- you know me, I don't try too hard to prevent
stupidity since that also prevents cleverness ....
But I suppose in this case the test should rule out unbindable mapatoms.
> More seriously, does the code know how to bind a subscripted variable
> locally?
plot2d does, didn't try plot3d.
best
Robert Dodier